Band Country Survey for Southern Africa

Last updated: 2012-04-30


Notice: © 1994 to 2012, Chris R. Burger. This document may be reproduced as required for personal use, and may be freely referenced from other Web sites. However, publication elsewhere requires express prior written permission from the author.


Introduction

This listing shows the number of current DXCC countries (or "entities") worked on each frequency band by southern African stations. To level the playing field to the greatest extent possible, the listed scores do not include deleted countries. The total number of possible countries for this list is 340. The latest new country included is South Sudan ST0 and the latest deleted country is M-V Island R1M.

Apart from single band totals, we also list a five band total and a ten band total. The five band totals are for 28, 21, 14, 7 and 3,5 MHz. These are the bands that are valid for the major five-band awards like 5BWAC, 5BDXCC, 5BWAZ and 5BWAS. From the tables, it's obvious that the level of competition is much higher on these bands than on the remaining five.

The ten band totals also include 50, 25, 18, 10 and 1,8 MHz.

This listing is updated regularly as often as justified by inputs. Please keep me up to date with your progress, so that your scores can be kept current. A monthly update would be ideal. Revisit this URL regularly, to see what the denizens of the ether have been up to!


Chris R. Burger ZS6EZ
Box 4485
Pretoria
0001 South Africa


50 MHz
136 ZS6WB
129 ZS6AXT
128 ZS6NK
110 ZS6EZ
105 ZS6BTE
98 Z22JE ++
21 MHz
329 ZS6EZ
306 ZS4TX
306 ZS6KR
304 ZS6WB
291 ZS6YQ ++
272 ZS6AOO ==
10,1 MHz
266 ZS6EZ
236 ZS6UT
222 ZS6WB
221 ZS2DL
212 ZS5LB ==
207 ZS2EZ
1,8 MHz
207 ZS4TX
176 ZS5LB ==
138 ZS6EZ
124 ZS1REC
107 ZS6UT
80 ZS6WN
28 MHz
315 ZS6EZ
295 ZS4TX
285 ZS6WB
275 ZS6P
266 ZS6AOO ==
261 ZS6KR
18,1 MHz
303 ZS6EZ
267 ZS2EZ
260 ZS6AVM ++
252 ZS2DL
247 ZS6AJD ==
244 ZS6WB
7 MHz
328 ZS4TX
313 ZS6EZ
280 ZS6KR
263 ZS6P
245 ZS6WB
243 ZS2DL
5 Band
1534 ZS4TX
1526 ZS6EZ
1360 ZS6KR
1306 ZS5LB ==
1291 ZS6WB
1259 ZS6P
24,9 MHz
282 ZS6EZ
259 ZS6AVM ++
249 ZS2EZ
228 ZS6NJ
225 ZS6AJD ==
219 ZS2DL
14 MHz
330 ZS6EZ
330 ZS6YQ ++
315 ZS6KR
312 ZS4TX
312 ZS6AJD ==
312 ZS6P
3,5 MHz
293 ZS4TX
251 ZS5LB ==
239 ZS6EZ
199 ZS6KR
168 ZS6WB
141 ZS6P
10 Band
2623 ZS6EZ
2184 ZS6WB
2145 ZS4TX
2066 ZS5LB ==
1850 ZS2DL
1761 ZS2EZ

Key: "++" indicates Silent Key (ZS6AVM, ZS6YQ). "==" indicates inactive operators whose totals are unlikely to change. Some do not have access to antennas (ZS5LB, ZS6AJD). Some have emigrated (ZS5K, ZS6AOO, ZS6IR).

Important note: All totals above 150 have been reduced by one to reflect the deletion of M-V Island (R1M). If this reduction was inappropriate, please submit revised totals to more accurately reflect your actual standings.



Updating your Totals

Whenever you feel like it, you can send me your new totals. Whenever I feel like it, I'll publish an updated list. Fortunately, I normally do feel like it whenever I receive new information...

Basic policy: I want current, worked DXCC scores by band. All bands from 1,8 to 54 MHz are included.

To expand on this policy:

  • Current: Include only current DXCC entities. Deleted entities do not count.
  • Worked: If you've worked it, you include it. No QSL is required. Confirmed totals are recognised by DXCC lists elsewhere on this Web site. If you really, really thought you'd worked it but you subsequently discovered that you were not in the log, the decision is up to you. To my mind, if you hadn't ordered a QSL you would still think that you'd worked it, so it should probably count to make it directly comparable to other claimed scores.
  • The simpler, the better. A simple text email with the scores for every band will be sufficient. However, I'm not picky. Snail mail, phone calls and even a messenger with a cleft stick can be used, as long as they get to me.
  • No need to calculate 5 Band and 10 Band scores. I will do that myself. However, sending them provides a form of checking in case you (or I!) made a typo.

    Past Records

    Several older versions of this document can be found on this Web site:

  • Standings at the end of 2011, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • Standings at the end of 2010, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • Standings at the end of 2008, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • Standings at the end of 2005, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • Standings at the end of 2004, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • A summary of activity during 2002, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • A summary of activity during 2001, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • A summary of activity during 2000, including a Top Ten (rather than a Top Six) in each category.

  • The Top Six table at the end of 1999.

  • The Top Six table during 1998.

  • The Top Six table during 1997.

  • The Top Six table at the end of 1996.

    These tables make good reading for those who think that the current totals are out of reach. The leading scores were not all that spectacular when this list was first published. You could make the list on one band with 27 countries, and there were four bands with entry levels of less than 60. The leading 10 band score was less than 2000. Only three stations had single band scores over 300, and they were all on 14 MHz. The leading station on 50 MHz had 92 countries. In fact, there are two bands on which five of the top six scores would not have survived to the present day! Bottom line: Most of the leading scores on today's table were made in the past solar cycle. You can do it too!


    Future Records

    As you can imagine, keeping this list up to date is a major chore. Updating totals as they arrive is the easy part. The hard part is nagging people to submit updates on a semi-regular basis.

    The list's biggest drawback is that it relies on claims. Claims are subject to bad bookkeeping (such as when an HA callsign becomes a 5A callsign when the Morse code is too fast), wishful thinking (such as that contact that you're not really certain about, but it's worth a try) and even perhaps some deception (although I should hope not!).

    DXCC gets past all of these drawbacks through objective scrutiny. They have a fairly secure process and they apply rules fairly uniformly. In years past, DXCC lists were not all that we required, because they did not have DXCCs on every band, fees were expensive and QSLing was also expensive. As a result, one could not reasonably expect a ZS DXer to obtain DXCC credits for every QSO.

    Fortunately, times have changed for the better. There is now a single-band DXCC on every band and every mode. Confirmations have become far quicker, easier and cheaper with the arrival of LotW. Even DXCC itself has become cheaper with the arrival of Online DXCC. As a result, we might just as well publish DXCC scores. They possibly lag behind worked scores by a bit, but they are verified and they do not require direct reporting to the compiler. All I'll have to do is to periodically check the ARRL lists, as I am already doing.

    I have therefore taken a policy decision to discontinue this Band Country Survey sooner or later. After that point, I will only publish ARRL DXCC scores. I haven't decided when, but it will probably be some time in 2013.

    The DXCC scores are already being published on my Web site.

    Unfortunately, historic scores such as those of ZS5LB, ZS6AJD, ZS6AOO, ZS6AVM and ZS6YQ will no longer be included in the records, as the single band DXCC awards were not available when they were active. However, as this archive will remain accessible on the Web, their achievements will not be forgotten.

    Of the currently-active stations, most already hold single-band DXCC awards. On 7 MHz, the Top Six stations all hold DXCCs, and apart from minor reshuffling and slightly lower scores, nothing will change. And on each band, at least three of the top six stations already hold single band DXCCs. There is not a single band where more than two of the Top Six will be eliminated due to inactivity.

    Bottom line: If you don't already have a Single Band DXCC on every band that you're active on, please go through the motions and get the certificates. We'd love to keep recognising your performance, even after I start taking a break from almost two decades of publishing this Survey!


    Rating your Progress

    I've written a short piece, describing how one can assess DX achievement a little more accurately than just comparing the numbers. For example, how much better is 280 than 240? How much effort is required to get onto the DXCC Honour Roll once you've passed the 300 mark? How much effort does it take to catch the remaining nine countries once you're on the Honour Roll? How does your score on a specific band really stack up? The answers may astound you.


    An Offshore Comparison

    In these pages, I've often mentioned that I felt that ZS DXers were under-achieving. To impart a notion of why I feel this way, I've included results from a comparable survey in Britain on this Site. Look at them, and see what you think!


    Those Callsigns listed in the Tables

    The tables can be very impersonal. I've therefore written a short profile on each of the operators. The intention is not only to put some "faces" to the callsigns, but also to give the reader an indication of how active each of these operators is. Clearly, while a few are retired and have enough time to play radio, the majority hold down jobs, raise families and generally spend time pursuing other interests. The odd spell of DXing certainly doesn't preclude balance!


    Return to ZS6EZ's Radio Page